Dariusz,

Someway, somehow, I get an error message
from struts or tomcat saying:
MAPPING configuration error for request URI

In my jsp i have:

<img src='/myImgServlet?imgId=<%= imgId %>'>

And my web.xml has the following mappings /
declarations:

<!-- Display Photo Servlet -->
 <servlet>
  <servlet-name>myImgServlet</servlet-name>
  <servlet-class>com.foobar.MyImgServlet</servlet-class>
 </servlet>

<!-- Display Photo Servlet Mapping -->
 <servlet-mapping>
      <servlet-name>myImgServlet</servlet-name>
      <url-pattern>/myImgServlet</url-pattern>
 </servlet-mapping>



Can someone help me out ?


----- Original Message -----
From: "Dariusz Wojtas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 6:20 PM
Subject: Re[2]: Composite jsp files


> Maybe I misunderstood you, but ...
> Why can't you use the <img> tag?
> Image file isnot send in the same response that the jsp/html
> file is sent. Browser makes another call for the image
> after parsing the html code.
>
> Why don't you just print:
>     <img src='/myImgServlet?imgId=<%= imgId %>'>
> ?
> And it works perfectly with the <logic> tags mentioned below.
> There is also no need to change the response type in the middle of
> writing to your output stream, because it is completely different call.
> You just set it once.
> And it will be served by separate servlet (here '/myImgServlet').
>
> Dariusz Wojtas
>
> Wednesday, August 28, 2002, 5:44:40 PM, you wrote:
> LW> Thanks John &  Cliff (prior answer).
>
> LW> But john, unfortunately I can't use the img
> LW> src tag since the images are directly retrieved
> LW> from a database. It doesn't make sense to
> LW> first (temporarily) store the images and then
> LW> use the img source tag. Instead, I directly
> LW> print the images by using the
> LW> response.getOutputStream (or something similar)
> LW> and setting the contentType + writing the bytes.
>
> LW> Cliff helped me out by showing me the <include>
> LW> tags, which i think can be very usefull.
>
> LW> If this does not work, you will hear me scream ;)
>
> LW> Regards,
>
> LW> Leonard
>
> LW> ----- Original Message -----
> LW> From: "John Raley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> LW> To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> LW> Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 4:23 PM
> LW> Subject: Re: Composite jsp files
>
>
> >> With Struts logic:equal tag:
> >>
> >> <logic:equal ...><img src="..."></logic:equal>
> >>
> >> Check the doc for the various logic:equal options.
> >>
> >> Leonard Wolters wrote:
> >>
> >> >Is it possible to concatenate jsp files to one ?
> >> >
> >> >The problem i have now is that tomcat / catalina
> >> >is complaining when I write multiple times to
> >> >the outputstream. A nice: java.lang.IllegalStateException:
> >> >getOutputStream() has already been called for this response
> >> >is shown to me.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >My question is if anyone know how to concat jsp files,
> >> >or to dymanically create jsp.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >The problem is as follows: I have a certain jsp file which
> >> >may / may not show an image. Based on a particular
> >> >(custom made) tag an image should be shown or not.
> >> >In both cases, the rest of the page should remain the
> >> >same.
> >> >
> >> >Does anyone has tips / suggestions how to do this ????
> >> >
> >> >T.i.a.
> >> >
> >> >Leonard
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Check it out: Map -> JavaBean
> >> http://dynclass.sourceforge.net/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> LW> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> For additional commands, e-mail:
> LW> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>
>
>
>
>
> LW> --
> LW> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> LW> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>  Dariusz Wojtas         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to