But do you have to worry about people that disable javascript, check to see if they do and if they do not tell them that they have to enable Javascript to use your site. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Eddie Bush" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 10:10 AM Subject: Re: [OT][WORKFLOW] Any best practice for "back", "save", "continu e" buttons?
> Yes, it does! I can vouch for it! I personally know two (highly > educated) people that refuse to allow them. They are ignorant about > them, of course, but that doesn't change the fact that people *do* > disable cookies/JavaScript! > > Now, if I know two people, then how many more people are there "out > there" that are doing this? Sorry to disagree - I view it as a "fact of > life". Having said that though, I don't not use JavaScript because of > it. That's yet another opportunity to control things - it certainly > does have applicability. > > Galbreath, Mark wrote: > > >Ahhh yes, the bane of web app developers! I solved this problem with > >JavaScript and cookies - no browser back operations allowed! > > > >And spare me the "what if JavaScript is turned off" noise - it just doesn't > >happen in the REAL world. > > > >Mark > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Andrew Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 3:02 AM > > > >(Incidentally, using the browsers back button in such a case results in a > >rather bad case of server state confusion!) > > > > -- > Eddie Bush > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
