+1 and DynaValidatorActionForms have frosting :) robert
> -----Original Message----- > From: James Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 2:03 PM > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: RE: [SELL STRUTS] How do you sell the ActionForm idea? > > > Have you used DynaActionForm? > > They're like little gold nuggets of magic ;) > > > James Mitchell > Software Engineer\Struts Evangelist > Struts-Atlanta, the "Open Minded Developer Network" > http://www.open-tools.org/struts-atlanta > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dan Cancro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 1:12 PM > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > Subject: [SELL STRUTS] How do you sell the ActionForm idea? > > > > > > I'm trying to sell a colleague on using Struts, and I'm pretty > > close, but he > > can't understand the value of using ActionForm classes instead of just > > HashMaps. Has anyone else had to make this case? The > validate() method is > > one advantage, but it seems obsolete now that we have the validator > > framework (correct me if I'm wrong). Maybe it's the reset() > > method. Would > > it be possible to achieve the reset() functionality (maybe by adding > > something to the config file) if Struts used HashMaps instead of > > ActionForms? > > > > Thanks, > > Dan > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
