Mine was a reference to yesterday (as I'm sure your changing the subject line is) and was intentional. Hey, Dave! Wake up! :-)
-----Original Message----- From: Dave Derry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 9:36 AM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: [FRIDAY] More coffee needed!! That's still Derry.................Dave Derry! But I guess if it's easier for you...........................you can call be Jerry ;-) Dave Derry ----- Original Message ----- From: "Galbreath, Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Thanks a lot, Jerry. > > ;-) > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Derry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > He's doing it as a service for those who are filtering you Mark! ;-)) > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Galbreath, Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Hey man! RU refactoring my messages? ;-) > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Andrew Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > For multiple, you also must set values back to false in reset() (The > > question here of course is which checkbox refers to which element. You may > > need to refactor such that your checkboxes return non boolean values so > you > > can tell which is which at the server end). > > The reason for this is that the html spec in all its gory... uh I mean > > glory... has in its infinite wisdom defined that a checkbox (& radio > button > > I think) that has not been ticked will not submit any value to the server. > > Afaik same is true for SELECT btw (multiple selections where nothing > > selected) > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
