Some how I assume that you did not need to configure each webapp in the
conf file. (I guess I am just lazy).
Anyway I noticed that the default web app had the session settings so I
just copied the default web app and named it to our app.
This worked and it does appear faster than even tomcat 4.1.12 (using the
netscape browser timer).
The interesting thing is that Resin found a stray </logic:equal> in my html
and it gave a fairly readable error as well.
Tomcat has not complained about it.
If it will auto copile my java classes as it states, I think I may continue
developing with Resin.
We are going live with JBoss/Tomcat because of the internal connectors. If
a JBoss connector existed for Resin that my change things.
Thanks for the help.
"Andy Kriger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 10/08/2002 09:18:58 AM
Please respond to "Struts Users Mailing List"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: RE: [OT] Container Wars - Resin and sessions
have you tried...
<session-config enable-url-rewriting='true'/>
this enables Resin to track the session in the URL
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 9:23
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: [OT] Container Wars - Resin and sessions
We are using tomcat 4.04 and have tried 4.1.12 with out problems.
When I drop my working Struts app into Resin 2.1.5 it seems that it does
not keep the session.
(I can login, place a user bean in session then the next action looks for
that bean and when null, kicks us of the app)
I have not looked any deeper but I guess I expected it to deploy the same
way it does in Tomcat.
"Cliff Rowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 10/08/2002 07:02:34 AM
Please respond to "Struts Users Mailing List"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Struts Users Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: RE: [OT] Container Wars
Resin does it for me!
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Shreyas, Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: 08 October 2002 12:57
>To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
>Subject: RE: [OT] Container Wars
>
>
>Should JRun be used for large projects?
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 5:19 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: RE: [OT] Container Wars
>>
>> Jrun, Best of breed??
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Galbreath, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: 08 October 2002 11:55
>> To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
>> Subject: RE: [OT] Container Wars
>>
>>
>> No way, dude! Jetty sucks!
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 6:48 AM
>>
>> Prove it. Jetty could be the best or even a bucket!!!!!
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Galbreath, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: 08 October 2002 11:44
>>
>> Resin is much better than Tomcat.
>>
>> Andrew Hill wrote:
>>
>> >(Or tell em they can have any container so long as its Tomcat? (This
>> would
>> >be my choice if I was dictator for life ;->))
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>
>>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ----
>> --
>> ---------------
>>
>> Copyright material and/or confidential and/or privileged information
>> may be contained in this e-mail and any attached documents. The
>> material and information is intended for the use of the intended
>> addressee only. If you
>> are not the intended addressee, or the person responsible
>for delivering
>> it
>> to the intended addressee, you may not copy, disclose, distribute,
>> disseminate or deliver it to anyone else or use it in any
>unauthorised
>> manner or take or omit to take any action in reliance on it.
>To do so is
>> prohibited and may be unlawful. The views expressed in
>this e-mail may
>> not
>> be official policy but the personal views of the originator. If you
>> receive
>> this e-mail in error, please advise the sender immediately
>by using the
>> reply facility in your e-mail software, or contact
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Please also delete this e-mail and all documents attached
>immediately.
>> Many thanks for your co-operation.
>>
>> BMW Financial Services (GB) Limited is registered in England
>and Wales
>> under company number 01288537.
>> Registered Offices : Europa House, Bartley Way, Hook, Hants, RG27 9UF
>>
>---------------------------------------------------------------
>-----------
>> --
>> --------------
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
><mailto:struts-user->[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>For
>additional commands,
>e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>---
>Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.393 / Virus Database: 223 - Release Date: 30/09/2002
>
>
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.393 / Virus Database: 223 - Release Date: 30/09/2002
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
