> > Dynabeans are not really beans
>
> True.
>
> > so you cannot use them with the struts
> > bean tag (I've not tried the latest version though),
>
> False. Tags like <bean:write> *do* understand dynabeans, as does any
> Java code that uses BeanUtils and PropertyUtils directly.
glad about that so It does not work only in the stable branch
> you cannot use them
> > with the jstl apache implementation either
>
> Also false in at least one special case.
>
> DynaActionForm (and its subclasses) have a public getMap() method
> which returns a map of the property names and values. Therefore, the
> following statements are roughly equivalent when "customer" is a
> DynaActionForm:
>
> <bean:write name="customer" property="name"/>
>
> <c:out value="${customer.map.name}"/>
I know that but you cannot switch from dyna stuff to plain beans as you do with struts
or resin jstl, I usually mix dynabeans and beans all the time
>
> > BUT they work with the Resin
> > JSTL implementation (included in the container)
> >
>
> Don'tcha just love how people can lock you in to their own container
> with innocent extensions like this?
LOL, of course I'd love to see this extension implemented in apache JSTL
regards
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
