Can any one explain why we need to explicitly implement Serializable? Thanks, Vip.
-----Original Message----- From: Hohlen, John Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 1:07 PM To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' Subject: RE: Why isn't "DynaActionForm" serializable? Please disregard this question. I now realize "DynaActionForm" is serializable. John -----Original Message----- From: Hohlen, John Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 12:22 PM To: Struts-User (E-mail) Subject: Why isn't "DynaActionForm" serializable? Does anyone know why the "DynaActionForm" does not implement serializable? It looks like all the attributes inside this class are serializable (i.e. HashMap, DynaActionFormClass) so why couldn't this class be as well. Or was this done intentionally to prevent the storing of the form in the session? Someone else asked this question a while back, but was never responded to: http://www.mail-archive.com/struts-user@jakarta.apache.org/msg32653.html Thanks, JOHN --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
