Hi Nagendra, and thanks for your suggestion !
That "kinda" worked...
Using <var>
<var-name>datePatternStrict</var-name>
<var-value>dd.MM.yyyy</var-value>
</var>
resulted in the datefield being correctly validated to the dd.MM.yyyy format, but I
would also like it to allow both these formats of date :
08.11.1976 and 8.11.1976. I believe that the use of datePatternStrict force the use of
leading zeros ?
How come when I use only datePattern instead of datePatternStrict, nothing is
validated ?
Best Regards
Eirik Kjølsrud
-------------- original message -------------
> hi,
> use this syntax
> <var>
> <var-name>datePatternStrict</var-name>
> <var-value>dd/MM/yyyy</var-value>
> </var>
