Umberto, 

You may be better served by directing your queries to the struts-dev mailing list.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-= J

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Umberto Nicoletti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 8:04 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SCAFFOLD] StorageBeanBase feature request
> 
> 
> I have submitted a patch to Bugzilla 
> (http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21433) for 
> this issue.
> Is there anyone interested in it?
> 
> Thanks,
> Umberto
> 
> Umberto Nicoletti wrote:
> > I am in the middle of the process of defining the data 
> access layer to 
> > be used for a new Struts-based application, for which we 
> already use 
> > Scaffold's ProcessBeans.
> > 
> > We decided not to go with Hibernate as a persistence layer (to my 
> > disappointment) and to choose Scaffold Access/StorageBean 
> approach instead.
> > Reading on this list I found an email by Ted Husted saying 
> that he was 
> > (maybe still is?) not happy with the StorageBean deployment.
> > 
> > So my question is what should I do? I quite like the Scaffold data 
> > access layer and more importantly my DBA trusts it too.
> > I'd prefer to go with StorageBeanBase, but in this case I 
> should make 
> > minor modifications to the Scaffold code (which I will give 
> back to the 
> > community of course). The other option is the Access 
> approach, but it is 
> > deprecated and it is not nice to compile an application 
> with lots of 
> > warnings.
> > 
> > The modifications I have to introduce in the StorageBeanBase are:
> > 
> > replace all calls to
> > 
> > StatementUtils.executeUpdate(null,etc);
> > 
> > with:
> > 
> > StatementUtils.executeUpdate(getResource(),etc);
> > 
> > and add a static String resource=null; with getters and setters
> > that can be overriden by subclasses. This is motivated by 
> tha fact that 
> > I have tables located in many different schemas/db hosts and want 
> > ConnectionAdaptor to return the right connection for that 
> schema/db host.
> > 
> > Thank you,
> > Umberto
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to