I like the concept of the validator, but personally I don't have a lot of
confidence in it.
that's a bit harsh. I think as long as you know what it does and doesn't do, there's every reason to have confidence in it. It's an excellent package that will benefit even more when people use it and reports bugs or vote for existing ones or even submit patches in bugzilla :O
I sense an opportunity to share something I got from the Ant mailing list recently (struts gurus feel free to slap me down if the same sort of thing doesn't apply to struts) :
(1) open an enhancement request in bugzilla and attach your patch. If you just send it to the list it could get lost over time.
(2) send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] explaining why you think the enhancement is
worth it.(3) send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that the people who share your opinion
can go to the enhancement request and vote for it.(4) be persistent. It is often the case that committers have a lot of
time for Ant development in one week and almost none in the next.
This could mean you'll need to redo (2).
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
