Good. I'm glad you got it working.

I tend to use the <html:optionsCollection .../> and populate my collection
with LabelValue beans. It keeps things uncomplicated and simple.

I end up with code like this in my .jsp:

<html:select property="myProperty">
<html:optionsCollection name="myOptions" label="label" value="value"/>
</html:select>

robert

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sonam Belbase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 2:38 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: form properties and <html:options > with collection
>
>
> It's working now.
>
> I added a <bean:define> to define the bean which represents my
> collection of
> objects. I believe this is required in order to find the bean
> specified by the
> value
> of the collection attribute in the <html:options collection> tag.
>
> Thanks for your help Robert.
>
> SB
>
> Robert Taylor wrote:
>
> > If you continue to forward, it shouldn't. But if you redirect anywhere
> > in the chain, then that data is gone.
> >
> > Double check your attribute name spelling in your code and config file.
> > That's tripped me up before.
> >
> > robert
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Sonam Belbase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 1:46 PM
> > > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > > Subject: Re: form properties and <html:options > with collection
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Robert,
> > >
> > > In my action, on success I forward the request to a tiles
> > > definition called
> > > content.addNewName, which in return calls another definition.
> Could the
> > > data be lost because of this?
> > >
> > > <action   path="/journalSetType"
> > > type="com.msdw.libra.ae.actions.selectNewName"
> > >        name="newNameForm"
> > >        scope="request">
> > >        <forward name="success"  path="content.addNewName"/>
> > > </action>
> > >
> > >
> > > -SB
> > >
> > > Robert Taylor wrote:
> > >
> > > > Make sure you aren't redirecting the request, but rather forwarding.
> > > > If you redirect (which I suspect your are doing) and the form is
> > > > in the request scope, then you will lose all data set in the form.
> > > >
> > > > robert
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Sonam Belbase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 12:49 PM
> > > > > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > > > > Subject: form properties and <html:options > with collection
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > What is the best way of setting a Java Collection which holds Java
> > > > > Objects
> > > > > as a property of the form, and retrieving the Object and it's
> > > properties
> > > > >
> > > > > on a JSP?
> > > > >
> > > > > I've tried it as such but have not been successful:
> > > > >
> > > > > In my action, I have created a list called "myList" which
> > > holds objects
> > > > > of type "myClass".
> > > > > "myClass" has an attribute "name" and a getter method
> > > "getName". In the
> > > > > action I set the list
> > > > > as a property of a DynaValidatorForm:
> > > > >
> > > > > form.set("availableNamesList", myList );
> > > > >
> > > > > In struts-config:
> > > > >  <form-bean name="newNameForm"
> > > > > type="org.apache.struts.validator.DynaValidatorForm">
> > > > >       <form-property name="selectedName" type="java.lang.String"/>
> > > > >       <form-property name="availableNamesList"
> type="java.util.List"/>
> > > > > </form-bean>
> > > > >
> > > > > In the JSP:
> > > > >  <html:form  action="/addNewName" >
> > > > >         <html:select property="selectedName" size="5"
> > > multiple="false">
> > > > >
> > > > >               <html:options  collection="availableNamesList"
> > > > > property="name"  />
> > > > >          </html:select>
> > > > > </html:form>
> > > > >
> > > > > This results in the error: [ServletException
> > > in:/jsp/newName.jsp] Cannot
> > > > > find bean under name availableNamesList'
> > > > >
> > > > > If I put the list in session scope in my action with:
> > > > > request_.getSession().setAttribute("availableNamesList",  myList);
> > > > > this works fine.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'd like to avoid having to put the list in session scope
> and I don't
> > > > > understand why just setting the list
> > > > > as a property of the form doesn't work.
> > > > >
> > > > > Any help/guidance would be appreciated.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > SB
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and notify
> > > sender.  Sender
> > > > > does not waive confidentiality or privilege, and use is
> prohibited.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > --
> > > NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and notify sender.
> > > Sender does
> > > not waive confidentiality or privilege, and use is prohibited.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --
> NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and notify sender.
> Sender does not
> waive confidentiality or privilege, and use is prohibited.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to