And another good reason: <img src="<%=request.getContextPath()%>/images/pic.gif">
is (more fragile | more typing | harder to read | etc.) than: <html:img page="/images/pic.gif" /> -Max ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Friedman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 12:54 PM Subject: RE: Simple Question > For maintaining the JSESSIONID if someone has their cookies turned off - > this ensures the id is embedded in the link when cookies aren't available. > > Regards, > David > > -----Original Message----- > From: Srinivas Kusunam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 3:49 PM > To: > > Subject: Simple Question > > > > Hi All, > > I my team while in a Code-Review we had a discussion wether to use > > <html:img > or normal <a href="..................."> as the later > one can do the same work. One option accepted was why do we need Tag over > head if <a href=" "> can handle that ?? > > What do you guys suggest ???? > > Thanks, > Srini > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
