It is slower because it would have to do a DNS lookup for every IP. Sure, it could be cached but its just informational.
On Friday, July 26, 2013, [email protected] wrote: > The benefit would be the added convenience of seeing meaningful DNS names > instead of numeric IPs for those that prefer this. The added load on > stunnel would be trivial for reverse dns lookups on separate process > threads. > > ----------------- > What would be the benefit? It would slow stunnel down. > On Jul 26, 2013 5:47 PM, "[email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > '[email protected]');>" <[email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > '[email protected]');>> wrote: > Thanks, I guess I could do the equivalent with a batch file; but, was > really hoping for buitin support for this in stunnel. It would be nice to > see in the upcoming 5.00 release as an option. > > ----------------- > > Don't know on windows, but did a little test with a script to get the > hostnames. First did a test using you records, and then used my current > stunnel.log > > script stlog.chk > ================== > grep -Eo '([0-9]{1,3}\.){3}[0-9]{1,3}' /var/log/stunnel.log | sort | uniq > >stout > > echo "" >stout2 > for a in `cat stout` ; do > echo -n $a " ">>stout2; > host $a | awk '{print $5}' >>stout2; > done > > > The results of stout2 are > 127.0.0.1 localhost. > 173.194.74.108 qe-in-f108.1e100.net. > 173.194.74.109 qe-in-f109.1e100.net. > 192.168.128.201 3(NXDOMAIN) > 74.125.25.108 pa-in-f108.1e100.net. > 74.125.25.109 pa-in-f109.1e100.net. > > Probable would want to add some code to filter out private address. > > > Final step would be to scan original log and add the name on > > _______________________________________________ > stunnel-users mailing list > [email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > '[email protected]');> > https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users >
_______________________________________________ stunnel-users mailing list [email protected] https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users
