On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 12:16 PM, David H. Durgee <[email protected]> wrote:
> Given a lack of other suggestions here and elsewhere that yielded any > progress, I decided to download the current source and attempt to build it > on my system. I didn't see a routine to check for prerequisites being met, > so I wound up running ./configure several times and adding the libssl-dev, > libwrap0-dev and libsystemd-daemon-dev packages based on what I saw in the > output. Perhaps a check routine could be added later? > > I then ran make and the output contains neither errors nor warnings, so > that looks good. As suggested in the INSTALL file, I next ran make check > and received neither errors nor warnings. > > At this point the next step appears to be make install as root, but I am > wondering if I should uninstall the stunnel4 package from the repository > first. I am also wondering if I can simply use the existing > /etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf that I included in my first post in this thread > or if I should start over with one of the examples included with this > version. > > I would appreciate input from the list on this. If you want to see > further details, such as ./configure or make outputs or configuration files > just let me know and I will put them in a follow-up post. > > Dave, Friday I did try to build Stunnel 5.17 with Linux Mint x86_64 (as a VM in Win7 x64) and compiling OpenSSL 1.0.2a. I did remember getting some errors for SSLv2 with Stunnel 5.17. I'll try and do this again when I get home. I was going to try the latest OpenSSL 1.0.1m (latest 1.0.1 IIRC) but same thing with Stunnel 5.17. I did notice that it appears that all Debian repositories still use the insecure and vulnerable OpenSSL version, which demanded that I build the OpenSSL myself. -Rob
_______________________________________________ stunnel-users mailing list [email protected] https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users
