Did you consider also tuning SO_SNDBUF of the sending application?

"Sending application" is a commertial product, which is servicing many other transmissions, so I can't adjust it to slow transmissions only. In fact this problem is becouse of different calculation of throughput on L and R side of stunnel, so in my opinion I have to find solution on this server.

MHO Windows is probably not the best server platform...

You're right. I will try the same with stunnel on RedHat.


-----Oryginalna wiadomość----- From: Michal Trojnara
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 11:31 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [stunnel-users] problem with buffering data on stunnel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10.07.2015 20:17, wujot/Adalbert wrote:
But unencrypted session on path between Stunnel server and hi-speed
end server (both in LAN) is using TcpWindowSize on level 64KB -
131KB

Did you consider also tuning SO_SNDBUF of the sending application?

(in Windows 2008 or newer it is calculated automatically). So I
steel have at least 64KB buffer in stunnel.

IMHO Windows is probably not the best server platform...

Is there any possibility to force stunnel to use on faster part of
connection (LAN side) the value of TcpWindowSize similar to
calculated on slower part (on WAN side)?

I don't think such tricks are possible with BSD sockets.

BTW: You can also change BUFFSIZE in common.h and rebuild stunnel.

Best regards,
Mike
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=kA2M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
stunnel-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users

---
Ta wiadomość została sprawdzona na obecność wirusów przez oprogramowanie 
antywirusowe Avast.
http://www.avast.com

_______________________________________________
stunnel-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users

Reply via email to