Ludolf, You're probably right. I'm also doing a wild guess here. But the only way to solve the problem is to know and understand the traffic flow.
Regards Jose > El 30 mar 2016, a las 7:12, Ludolf Holzheid <[email protected]> > escribió: > >> On Wed, 2016-03-30 07:01:29 -0500, Josealf.rm wrote: >> Ivan, >> >> When you say you configure your AV-scanner to listen on localhost, how do >> you do it? Which ports does AV-scanner listen to? You can't have both >> stunnel and Avira listening on the same ports on the same interface. >> >> Check your traffic flow. It should be something like: >> >> Client -> Avira -> stunnel -> provider. >> >> Only the connection stunnel-provider will be encrypted. > > I thought the virus scanners are intercepting the network traffic > between TCP/IP stack and Ethernet driver and thus don't have to do > anything with TCP ports. > > If the virus scanner would work as an IP application (as stunnel > does), the viruses had to cooperate with the scanner in order to be > detected. > > Ludolf > > > -- > > Ludolf Holzheid > > Bihl+Wiedemann GmbH > Floßwörthstraße 41 > 68199 Mannheim, Germany > > Tel: +49 621 33996-0 > Fax: +49 621 3392239 > > mailto:[email protected] > http://www.bihl-wiedemann.de > > Sitz der Gesellschaft: Mannheim > Geschäftsführer: Jochen Bihl, Bernhard Wiedemann > Amtsgericht Mannheim, HRB 5796 > _______________________________________________ > stunnel-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users _______________________________________________ stunnel-users mailing list [email protected] https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users
