Hi, I've done some tests with stunnel v5.33b2 and I can confirm that this version fixes the memory leak I reported (and after the session cache is filled with entries, stunnel does not allocate more memory for next sessions).
One more question: do you have any recommendation for session cache size? On my systems I have set this to 30000. I have 32 GB of RAM so the memory is not the problem. My concerns are about time spent to search for entries in cache if I grow session cache size over 100000 entries. Thank you for your response. Best Regards, Adrian Irimescu On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Michał Trojnara < [email protected]> wrote: > On 16.05.2016 09:42, Adrian Irimescu wrote: > > Instead of this the stunnel allocates about 28K for any new session > > which does not have a stored session in cache and does not free this > > anymore. > > Please try: > https://www.stunnel.org/downloads/beta/stunnel-5.33b2.tar.gz > In my tests this fixes the memory leak you reported. > > Best regards, > Mike > > > _______________________________________________ > stunnel-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users > >
_______________________________________________ stunnel-users mailing list [email protected] https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users
