Hola, On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 04:07:57PM +0000, Martin Got wrote: > So second 'pppd' process started and runs simultaneously with the > first 'pppd' and link down. Restarting Stunnel server can clear child > 'pppd' processes. So newly reestablished 'pppd' link between 10.0.1.1 > <--> 10.0.1.2 endpoints works till next interconnection.
You might have multiple options - You could use the parameters like peer
passed to ip-up.d scripts use to kill the other instance on ip-up.
Run pppd through a wrapper to kill the old instance. Use linkname to write a
specific pid file.
#!/bin/sh
linkname=test
[ ! -f /var/run/ppp-${linkname}.pid ] || kill $(cat
/var/run/ppp-${linkname}.pid)
exec pppd linkname ${linkname} $*
Or you could use the routing table to find the interface and
kill the pppd based on that.
#!/bin/sh
iface=$(ip -o r get ${REMOTE_IP_ADDRESS} | sed -e 's/.*dev //' -e 's/
.*$//')
[ -z ${iface} ] || kill $(cat /var/run/ppp-${iface}.pid) ]
exec pppd $*
Both completely untested.
I would at least configure lcp-echo-failure and lcp-echo-interval so
the old pppd instance will soon die because of the missing connection.
IIRC the default is 3/10 so after 30 seconds the old instance will
die anyway.
> pppd[39187] pppd 2.3.5 started by user, uid 0
> pppd[43231] Using interface ppp1
> pppd[43231] Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyp2
> pppd[43231] Local IP address 10.0.1.1
> pppd[43231] Remote IP address 10.0.1.2
> pppd[39187] pppd 2.3.5 started by user, uid 0
> pppd[39187] Using interface ppp0
> pppd[39187] Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyp5
> pppd[39187] Couldn't set interface address: Address 10.0.1.1 or destination
> 10.0.1.2 already exists
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff [email protected]
UTF-8 Test: The 🐈 ran after a 🐁, but the 🐁 ran away
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ stunnel-users mailing list [email protected] https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users
