[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUBMARINE-60?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Adam Antal updated SUBMARINE-60:
--------------------------------
    Attachment: SUBMARINE-60.003.patch

> Remove stubServiceClient from YarnServiceUtils
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SUBMARINE-60
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUBMARINE-60
>             Project: Hadoop Submarine
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Szilard Nemeth
>            Assignee: Adam Antal
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: SUBMARINE-60.001.patch, SUBMARINE-60.002.patch, 
> SUBMARINE-60.002.patch, SUBMARINE-60.003.patch, SUBMARINE-60.003.patch
>
>
> We have a field in YarnServiceUtils: 
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.submarine.runtimes.yarnservice.YarnServiceUtils#stubServiceClient
> There's a setter for this field, marked with VisibleForTesting and the test 
> code uses this setter to set the value of this field to a mock.
> Then, when createServiceClient gets called from the production code, it first 
> checks if we have this field set. If so, we return it, otherwise we create a 
> normal app admin client.
> This is an anti-pattern to just have test-related fields or methods in the 
> production code.
>  
> Currently, YarnServiceJobSubmitter and YarnServiceJobMonitor are the only 
> users of 
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.submarine.runtimes.yarnservice.YarnServiceUtils#createServiceClient.
> This static could be easily replaced with a factory that receives the current 
> Configuration object then returns the AppAdminClient. The test should inject 
> the mock factory either via the constructor or with a setter.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to