C.Turner wrote:
  - arbitrary VKERNEL tty's via a fifo for 'detached' operation

Some people might argue that's what GNU screen is for, and fifos might not be the ideal way (plus, they're not ttys).

- auto host-side pf rulesets on vkernel startup (to constrain the vkernels)

This is possible, there are already many programs (on OpenBSD) hooking in to pf (e.g., openbgpd).

- expanding vkd's into some kind of spoofed cam / scsi bus to allow for 'hotswap' vkds , etc.

CAM isn't particularly nice though.

  - importing KAME SCTP, if there's any use for it and I'm capable of
    it.. (that one just got in my head somehow.. *cough* syslink
transport ..?? ;)

We already have SCTP support in-tree :).

@@ -159,7 +161,8 @@
                                netifFile[netifFileNum++] = optarg;
                        break;
                case 'r':
-                       rootImageFile = optarg;
+                       if ( vkdFileNum < VKD_MAX )
+                               vkdFile[vkdFileNum++] = optarg;
                        break;
                case 'm':
                        Maxmem_bytes = strtoull(optarg, &suffix, 0);

Why not if (vkdFileNum < VKD_MAX) { vkdFile[vkdFileNum] = optarg; vkdFileNum++; }; ? Because now it appears '16' is a valid number, where you start counting from 0, meaning a maximum of 17 devices...

Cheers,
--
        Thomas E. Spanjaard
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to