On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 07:42:55PM +0200, Aggelos Economopoulos wrote: > On Friday 14 March 2008, Matthew Dillon wrote: > [...] > > It all looks good, definitely commit it and maybe even MFC it to > > the release branch too. > > Committed. We don't have gcc-4.3 or icc in 1.12 so I don't think this needs > to go in the release branch (but if it did, the correct way to do it would > be with "cvs commit -r DragonFly_RELEASE_1_12 [files]", right? Sorry, but > I haven't used cvs for development since the first free software distributed > scm became available[*], so perhaps there's an extra quirk I don't remember > about?)
Please MFC it. The kernel violates the platform ABI and if anyone *wants* to run such a binary, she will run into issues. Joerg
