Daniel Roethlisberger wrote:
Simon 'corecode' Schuber <[email protected]> 2009-07-16:
Simon 'corecode' Schubert <[email protected]> added the comment:
Daniel Roethlisberger wrote:
Daniel Roethlisberger <[email protected]> 2009-07-10:
I guess it is easier to lock the queue file instead of fully
reopening and fixing the unlink() race.
I cleaned up my original hack, maybe this version is a tad more
convincing :)
This doesn't work for me. All processes are stuck in state lockf. I
think we can't reliably combine fcntl locks and flock locks.
Is that a DragonFlyBSD issue? On FreeBSD seem to be compatible
(both according to manual page and practical testing). Using
flock to synchronize on the dup()d / fork()d queue file
descriptor doesnŽt work in this case due to the semantics of
flock.
In any case, IŽm sorry that I cannot test / respond again for 3
weeks since IŽm abroad, far away from keyboard.
No problem, I fixed the issue by re-opening the queue file. Thanks for
your bug report!
cheers
simon
--
<3 the future +++ RENT this banner advert +++ ASCII Ribbon /"\
rock the past +++ space for low CHF NOW!1 +++ Campaign \ /
Party Enjoy Relax | http://dragonflybsd.org Against HTML \
Dude 2c 2 the max ! http://golden-apple.biz Mail + News / \
