Hi Dirkhh & Lubomir, Thanks a lot for the valuable feedback. I was interested to improve the code base, so I came up with this idea. I never knew there would be this much importance to goto, until he said.
I am convinced about it's usage, Suggest me some work so that I cn improve the C/C++ code of the codebase. I want to be a part of the community. Sorry for the coding style mistake. I will never repeat that,this was just my first experience with sending a patch. Thanks&Regards, Gopichand On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Gopichand Paturi <gopichandpat...@gmail.com > wrote: > Hi Dirkhh and others, > I am submitting my first patch(my first one ever). This is very minor and > acute. > > I am sending this,as an improvement to the existing code since > goto is not preferred as a reliable keyword in software development > process. > > I can change the logic regarding goto in all the cpp files in the existing > codebase. I am good at C++, so I am sure that I will not disturb the logic > part. > > If I am not sure,I will ensure not to touch that part of code. > This(removing goto) would make the code base more reliable. Let me know > your feedback. > > Thanks&Regards > Gopichand. >
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list subsurface@hohndel.org http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
