On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Guillaume Gardet <guillaume.gar...@free.fr> wrote:
> > I'd be more interested in a VPM implementation (that is reasonably well >> documented). We had a GSOC proposal to do just that and decided not to >> accept it but it's still something that we are open to if there's a >> developer with the necessary math / physics background willing to tackle >> the problem. >> > > Do you have pointers for implementing VPM? Willem wrote it was totally > proprietary. > RGBM is totally proprietary, but VPM is not. There are several VPM implementations available, and there has been several long discussions (technical and not) on this list. See: - VPM Technical Discussion: http://lists.hohndel.org/pipermail/subsurface/2014-March/010634.html - VPM Overview: http://lists.hohndel.org/pipermail/subsurface/2014-March/010746.html - VPM Discussion & GSoC planning: http://lists.hohndel.org/pipermail/subsurface/2014-March/010819.html - Technical Discussion on VPM: http://lists.hohndel.org/pipermail/subsurface/2014-March/010544.html - VPM Support: http://lists.hohndel.org/pipermail/subsurface/2013-March/005070.html I've added these mailing list links to a new VPM issue @ http://trac.hohndel.org/ticket/721 Cheers, Henrik
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list subsurface@hohndel.org http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface