Le 12/09/2014 01:25, Davide DB a écrit :
OMG!
https://aqwary.com
Davide@mobile
Wonder if they thought about the many aquatic animals that are
sensitive to ultrasound. Technology for technology's sake?
wf
So, you can dive but you cannot see animals? ;)
Maybe they choose good frequencies.
Guillaume
The question is much more fundamental. It is about the way that a
recreational diver needs to take care of her/his own safety and not to
depend on others except in an emergency situation. Dive safety is
largely dependent on consistent care and vigilance. The question is
whether dive safety would actually be improved if a diver can dive
knowing that if a problem arose: because the "net" takes care of this
problem. What happens to care and vigilance and the three pillars of
safe diving: knowledge, experience and skills? Do you just entrust these
to your fellow divers? If the whole team had this attitude, then maybe
no-one would have any of these vital skills? A computer cannot provide
skills. It can only provide information.
wf
_______________________________________________
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@hohndel.org
http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
