On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:48:14AM +0100, Davide DB wrote: > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Dirk Hohndel <d...@hohndel.org> wrote: > > > Hehe. Agreed to some extend. But as I mentioned, I know that he is trying > > to finish this code - real life has thrown him a lot of problems in the > > last three months and real life always comes first. > > Sorry if I gave the impression to put pressure on Tomaz and other. It's not > my intention, really. Maximum respect for private life. I'm just writing my > suggestions and idea with any reference to release date. Moreover I'm not a > developer here.
Nono, I didn't assume you were putting pressure on anyone. You very helpfully keep reminding us of your design idea. And you keep improving that idea. Thanks for doing that. > > I really agree with Davide that the buttons to show / clear / hide the > > filters are important and a must have for 4.3. > > I think that control/navigation buttons are fundamental to consider the > skeleton search/filter feature complete. Yep. > > The counts are a really cool idea so I want to at least look into how hard > > those would be to implement (and how confusing they would be to the user... > > you could have 30 boat dives and 200 photo dives, yet selecting both boat > > and photo you get 210 dives shown (because some, but not all boat dives are > > also photo dives)... I think this makes a lot of sense, but I'll need to see > > it in action. > > Hummm, if I understood it correctly, here we go back to something we > discussed at the very beginning of Tomaz implementation: > > how multiple filters should act together? Basically, AND or OR ? :) > > Despite of programming boolean operator, as a user I would imagine they > filter each other. > I will try to explain better. > > Selecting "reef" on tags view I should get a sublist of 132 dives where I > dove on reef. It's 100 in the picture :-) > If I add "Hap Collins" from the buddy view I (eventually) will get only the > reef dives where I dove with Hap. Hence 132 or less dives. > As the same manner if I select "Reef" and "Ojamo Mine" I will probably get > ZERO dives. So that's AND. > So coming back to Dirk's example, It's tricky :) > > > you could have 30 boat dives and 200 photo dives, yet selecting both boat > > and photo you get 210 dives shown (because some, but not all boat dives are > > also photo dives) > > IMHO I would expect to filter 230 dives. When filtering more items > (multiselection) in the same category I would expect to ADD them. > Form the mockup: If I select "Batman" and "Spiderman" in the buddies view I > will get all the dives with one of them (OR) And this is why it's confusing. Imagin you have three dives. Dive 1: boat Dive 2: photo Dive 3: boat photo So we show boat (2) photo (2) but selecting both we get three dives selected. Not four. > Basically, on multiselection I would expect OR vertically. AND orizontally. That's how it's implemented already. Have you tried it? /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
