> On Feb 17, 2015, at 5:00 AM, Michele Fabi <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I'm sorry for the wild quoting:
> 
> @Dirk
> Can you send the output of
> qmake-qt5 -v
> 
> I wonder if we use features that require 5.3 (that's the lowest that I
> have been compiling with, lately).
> 
> Dirk, Here it is
> [michele@localhost subsurface]$ qmake-qt5 -v
> QMake version 3.0
> Using Qt version 5.1.1 in /usr/lib64

As I guessed - too old

> [michele@localhost marble-build]$ cd ~/src/
> [michele@localhost src]$ git clone 
> git://subsurface-divelog.org/subsurface.git 
> <http://subsurface-divelog.org/subsurface.git>
> Cloning into 'subsurface'...
> remote: Counting objects: 36074, done.
> remote: Compressing objects: 100% (10198/10198), done.
> remote: Total 36074 (delta 27436), reused 34214 (delta 25775)
> Receiving objects: 100% (36074/36074), 25.75 MiB | 344 KiB/s, done.
> Resolving deltas: 100% (27436/27436), done.
> [michele@localhost src]$ cd subsurface
> [michele@localhost subsurface]$ git checkout v4.4 

Uhhh, I need to fix that. Please do

git checkout v4.4.0

Given some of the changes we just did in master I think it would be much better 
if you used the last release.

/D
_______________________________________________
subsurface mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface

Reply via email to