Rick, > On 17.06.2015, at 17:37, Rick Walsh <rickmwa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think to accomplish this, we need to consider a gaschange-on-the-run as a > zero minute segment. I do no think it is correct to have the change on the > ascent leg up to the change depth, as that would imply switching gas deeper > than the MOD.
have a look at this (this is with your patch): https://www.dropbox.com/s/rqxyjywsza8h8a8/Screenshot%202015-06-17%2017.39.14.png?dl=0 <https://www.dropbox.com/s/rqxyjywsza8h8a8/Screenshot%202015-06-17%2017.39.14.png?dl=0> The table says depth duration runtime gas 15m 1min 1min air 15m 19min 20min 11m 1min 21min 9m 0min 21min 6m 1min 21min EAN80 0m 6min 28min To me, this looks like the gas change should be at 6m but from the profile plot you can see that it of course is planned for 9m. For this dive, I would expect the 9m line to show EAN80 and the 6m line not to be there at all. Best Robert -- .oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oO Robert C. Helling Elite Master Course Theoretical and Mathematical Physics Scientific Coordinator Ludwig Maximilians Universitaet Muenchen, Dept. Physik Phone: +49 89 2180-4523 Theresienstr. 39, rm. B339 http://www.atdotde.de Enhance your privacy, use cryptography! My PGP keys have fingerprints A9D1 A01D 13A5 31FA 6515 BB44 0820 367C 36BC 0C1D and DCED 37B6 251C 7861 270D 5613 95C7 9D32 9A8D 9B8F
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
