Hi Dirk, I sent this patch to print the VPM-B conservatism level in the planner notes, similar to how we print gradient factors for Buhlmann. I definitely think we should do this in one way or another.
Was this patch overlooked, or is there a problem with it? When I sent it you were probably considering greater issues. Rick On 2 Sep 2015 21:54, "Rick Walsh" <rickmwa...@gmail.com> wrote: > Signed-off-by: Rick Walsh <rickmwa...@gmail.com> > --- > planner.c | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/planner.c b/planner.c > index e0f889e..4a191ca 100644 > --- a/planner.c > +++ b/planner.c > @@ -552,7 +552,10 @@ static void add_plan_to_notes(struct diveplan > *diveplan, struct dive *dive, bool > snprintf(temp, sz_temp, translate("gettextFromC", "based > on Buhlmann ZHL-16B with GFlow = %d and GFhigh = %d"), > diveplan->gflow, diveplan->gfhigh); > } else if (prefs.deco_mode == VPMB){ > - snprintf(temp, sz_temp, "%s", translate("gettextFromC", > "based on VPM-B")); > + if (prefs.conservatism_level == 0) > + snprintf(temp, sz_temp, "%s", > translate("gettextFromC", "based on VPM-B at nominal conservatism")); > + else > + snprintf(temp, sz_temp, translate("gettextFromC", > "based on VPM-B at +%d conservatism"), prefs.conservatism_level); > } else if (prefs.deco_mode == RECREATIONAL){ > snprintf(temp, sz_temp, translate("gettextFromC", > "recreational mode based on Buhlmann ZHL-16B with GFlow = %d and GFhigh = > %d"), > diveplan->gflow, diveplan->gfhigh); > -- > 2.4.3 > >
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface