> On Oct 11, 2015, at 3:35 PM, Gaetan Bisson <bis...@archlinux.org> wrote: > > [2015-10-12 00:20:14 +0300] Lubomir I. Ivanov: >> i would say -1 for $XDG_DATA_HOME as that doesn't seem to be >> established very well, yet. >> but $HOME/.local/share/subsurface is less intrusive than ~/.subsurface >> IMHO, so +1 to that. > > As far as I understand the XDG specs: > - the cloud storage cache should go under ~/.cache/Subsurface/ > - the configuration file should go under ~/.config/Subsurface/ > - some other things should go under ~/.local/share/Subsurface/ > > To me, that really scatters user data over many directories for > little-to-no benefit. Instead, I'd like an app called Subsurface to > simply write its user data under ~/.subsurface/: that's a unique > directory for me to symlink, backup, or rename, for instance in case > there's an issue I want to debug with a fresh profile. > > But that's just my two cents.
I'll add my +2 cents as well. I think this makes more sense. /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface