On 11 November, 2015 - Robert C. Helling wrote: > Hi, > > > On 11 Nov 2015, at 18:08, Dirk Hohndel <d...@hohndel.org> wrote: > > > > And then we turn building it off by default and no one gets it, or we turn > > it on by default, and we added the same dependencies to building the > > Subsurface package. I guess that's my point. I wonder if this wouldn't be > > better off being its own project, with its own repository, its own > > releases, its own builds, etc. > > how often will this really be used? I would say O(1) times by users that > transition from the old Smartrak software to subsurface. > > Why don’t we offer this as a web service (if you want I could run this on my > server) where you upload a .sgl file and get a .ssrf file back. In this case, > we don’t have to provide ten thousands different builds, just one that runs > on the server. > > What do you think? >
Letting it live in the subsurface source, off by default, and have a webpage where you can run the program for you. Those who don't care about Smartrak can ignore it, those who would like to transition can easily do it and the code is in a place where those who would like to play with it can do so. //Anton -- Anton Lundin +46702-161604 _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
