> On 31 Jan 2016, at 21:02, Dirk Hohndel <d...@hohndel.org> wrote: > > >> On Jan 31, 2016, at 11:55 AM, Willem Ferguson >> <willemfergu...@zoology.up.ac.za> wrote: >> >> On 31/01/2016 21:29, Dirk Hohndel wrote: >>> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 09:23:48PM +0200, Willem Ferguson wrote: >>>> Ok, 675 works and 676 crashes. >>>> Hope this helps a bit? >>> It should. >>> >>> Please try -763 >>> >> 763 Working perfectly. > > Excellent. So now we need to figure out how to move the dive # up again so we > don't run out of space... > Patches welcome :-) By reverting that old commit you once agin introduced the problem with a column being to wide for the device screen, for me the profile is slightly wider (no right hand margin) which leads to a truncation on the last digit of the dive #.
Looking at the code changes the only thing that pops out for me, and that have proven to be problematic before is that when the drive # was in the top row it was right aligned while all the other objects in the 4:th column does not have any alignment reference. It might be worth a try to revert cba50ec and remove the alignment specification of the dive #. > > /D > > _______________________________________________ > subsurface mailing list > subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org > http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface /Jocke _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
