On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 01:38:08PM -0800, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 01:12:35PM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On segunda-feira, 25 de janeiro de 2016 09:33:58 PST Saether Jan-Arve wrote: > > > I will try to reproduce it here and create a issue for it. > > > > Hello Jan Arve > > > > Did you manage to reproduce it? It's easily reproducible with Subsurface in > > 5.6.0rc, but it's not dissected to a testcase. > > While Subsurface is not exactly small and easy to build, I'll be happy to > help anyone trying to track this down. > > Basically... > > clone latest master of Subsurface from git://subsurface-divelog.org/subsurface
Correction: please clone Subsurface, but then check out commit 12f36c92e1c00459e354577a2db1ce06e240b322 because I will check a brute force workaround into master in a few minutes with which I no longer run into the issue. This doesn't change the fact that this is broken at the commit above and that this is clearly a regression as the same QML works fine with 5.5.1 (and if you look at the fix you'll see that I just force all columns to have the same preferred and maximum width) /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface