On 10-04-16 02:20, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Dirk Hohndel <d...@hohndel.org> wrote:
As expected, the individual dives run roughly 4k per hour dive time. This is
with the libdivecomputer default XML output (to make my life easier I just used
dctool for the download). I think our XML for example is much denser... so I
think the amount of data will be manageable.
I'm not sure that we're _much_ denser, but yeah, we should be a bit better.
It might still be a good idea to just eventually compress the data
with zlib or something fairly trivial like that, but that's just a
small tweak on top of whatever protocol..
Or transfer the raw dive data, and do the parsing in subsurface? The raw data is
likely the most dense format.
Jef
_______________________________________________
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
