On quinta-feira, 23 de junho de 2016 12:42:36 PDT Dirk Hohndel wrote: > No, careful. I’m grudgingly accepting the fact that we need to compile with > the -std=c++11 flag in order to build against Qt5.7. I am NOT ok with > including C++11 features in the code. I’d prefer my code to be readable. > Or to be more explicit - I don’t understand how the new features work, I > can’t parse the syntax, and if there is one thing that I have learned over > the past year it’s that I’m on my own when it comes to maintaining this. > So code that I don’t understand is not welcome.
Of course. Unreadable code is never welcome and "unreadable" is quite subjective. We're having similar discussions in Qt itself as to how much of C++11 is acceptable. For example, the "Almost Always Auto" (AAA) suggestions have been denied and we'll continue to name our variables with the correct type, with a few exceptions. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface