On 27 November 2016 at 21:35, Robert Helling <hell...@atdotde.de> wrote:
> > Am 26.11.2016 um 23:24 schrieb Anton Lundin <gla...@acc.umu.se>: > > > It depends if i step to +1 from +0 or from +2. Timing issue somewhere? > Weird numeric instability? > > Anton, I got even weirder numeric instability for dive with 60min at 30m on 32% nitrox: Subsurface dive plan based on VPM-B at +2 conservatism, effective GF=-2147483648/-2147483648 Runtime: 96min > > > > Excellent spot! It first compiled the planner notes before computing the > new gradient factors. > > Here is a patch. > > > Robert, your patch fixes the above bug. Same dive: Subsurface dive plan based on VPM-B at +2 conservatism, effective GF=63/63 Runtime: 96min Cheers, Rick
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
