On 21 January, 2017 - Dirk Hohndel wrote: > On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 12:28:52PM +1100, Rick Walsh wrote: > > Hi, I'll be going to OzTek (dive conference and exhibition) in Sydney > > March. Firstly, is there anyone else involved in Subsurface who's going > > and would like to meet up. Secondly, there'll be representatives from > > various manufacturers, agencies and DAN with stalls. Is there anything > > anyone wants to find out more about? Shearwater? Divesoft? Mares? The > > conference presentations look interesting too. > > Cool. I don't think I'll happen to be Sydney in March (sadly).
10 years since I was living in Sydney, so it would be fun to visit but a bit to far =) I'll just recommend walking around saying Hi to people, and try to grow some contacts. It might make it easier to get support / documentation / loot next time it actually matters =) > Shearwater we have great relationships with (ok, they still owe me a > response on more details of the new BTLE communication, but hey, they > already sent me a Perdix AI). We used to have a contact at Mares, but he > left. Do they still produce new dive computers? I would love to get some feedback from them about their calibration values of their O2 sensors. I've reverse-engineered a patch which produces what looks to be the right values, but it would be great if someone with internal knowledge about how its thought could comment on my analysis. ( The short and curly: Shearwater stores their voted/computed/averaged ppO2, and the mV from the actual sensors in each sample. They also store a "calibration value" in the dive header of unknown unit. If I take that * about 1000 (1024?) the average of the sensors will produce the same ppO2 as they have stored in my sample data. Is that bogus math or is it the right<tm> way? ) > No idea about Divesoft. We already support the Divesoft Freedom-series computers. We talked to them over email, and they sent us a header-file with the actual structs they write to their log-files, so that way I could correct all the mistakes I/we did when reverse-engineering the format. ( Things like Temperature in 1/10 C, 10 bit signed wasn't that easy... ) Divesoft makes a really good helium analyser to. Way better than Analox variant. A itch to scratch is to make all those file-based importers behave more like a regular dc-download, IE point them to a directory, and they will import all the dives that you're missing. This goes for the Divesoft, Seabear and probably a couple more. > I know that people keep hoping for support for Liquivision support. Not > sure if there's any hope to move forward on that... Direct download would be cool, but we atleast got a direct importer nowadays in core/liquivision.c. A quick glance says it looks reverse enginnered, but hey, we got one. //Anton -- Anton Lundin +46702-161604 _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface