Hi, > On 22. Apr 2017, at 19:24, Dirk Hohndel <d...@hohndel.org> wrote: > > So we seen to write an extra po2='0.6 bar' - but we don't appear to do that > when I run it here. I haven't spent much time beyond that very basic > analysis, though... >
I had a brief look but have no idea either. Just one or two remarks: This is a CCR dive and this is the first depth sample. And indeed, 0.6bar is the correct pO2 there. It might be caused by some code that wants to make sure this is a CCR dive by adding a pO2 value there but I have no clue how this can be a Heisenbug. Sorry have to run now. Best Robert
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
