On 13 June 2017 at 23:58, Thiago Macieira <thi...@macieira.org> wrote: > On terça-feira, 13 de junho de 2017 13:16:21 PDT Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote: >> i cannot reproduce the problem, but also the above should not happen >> as we allocate the cylinder "type" (tank_info_t->name) on the heap and >> it's address cannot be so low (0x1770). > > It comes from: > > struct tank_info_t *info = &tank_info[index.row()]; > > which is a global variable in core/equipment.c: > > struct tank_info_t tank_info[100] = { > ... > }; > > and has been so since 2013. I don't see how > a) tank_info could be wrong (unless it's a major compilation problem) > and > b) how index.row() could have been so exactly wrong to produce a pointer in > the second memory page (it's too much of a coincidence)
hmm, both are possible. i would be bet on b) as i haven't seen anything like a) in recent GCC - not that it's bug free. lubomir -- _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface