On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 08:42:07PM +0200, Stefan Fuchs wrote: > Hallo Dirk, hallo Robert, > > Am 15.10.2017 um 12:13 schrieb Dirk Hohndel: > >> Regarding the planner it is the case than still some items are open > >> including some PRs from my side which need more testing and also some > >> open issues. But I fully agree with Robert that it doesn't really matter > >> if we fix/merge this in 4.7 or 4.7.1 or even later. > > Yes, that's my approach as well. The Beta releases that we used to do > > really didn't work. Not enough people tested them and we still ended up > > with quite a few problems in the .0 release. Instead I'm planning to > > simply do a new point release every week or two until we are happy with > > what we have. > Following this plan would it then even be an option to add my open > planner related PRs for 4.7? > We all know that for these kind of items I will get almost no feedback > also not on the mailing list. > So I would be even happy about complaints coming after we do a 4.7 > release with those changes. At least this would allow me to further > improve what I did or worst worst case we revert it.
I'll leave that decision to Robert... he maintains the planner. Robert - pull the planner changes that you want to be in 4.7, please. /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface