On 15 November 2017 at 17:20, Dirk Hohndel <d...@hohndel.org> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 05:08:49PM +0200, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote: >> On 15 November 2017 at 17:03, Dirk Hohndel <d...@hohndel.org> wrote: >> > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 04:36:25PM +0200, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote: >> >> On 15 November 2017 at 16:27, Dirk Hohndel <d...@hohndel.org> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > With Lubomir's changes there are two ways to get the console output: >> >> > >> >> > You can run from cmd.exe - then the output is shown on the screen, but >> >> > not >> >> > saved to the log files. >> >> > Or you can run this by double clicking on the executable. Then the log >> >> > output is saved to the two log files. >> >> > >> >> >> >> something to note here, is that by default when the Subsurface.exe is >> >> started from the desktop shortcut, the log files would remain mostly >> >> empty because the executable does not receive any "-v" arguments. >> >> so to see verbose output the user has to manually append the "-v"s in >> >> the desktop shortcut <path-to-exe> field. >> > >> > Which makes me wonder... should we just use verbose=1 as default if >> > started from the shortcut on Windows? >> > >> >> i was implying the same question, in a way. >> but then, what if the user needs to see something which requires more >> verbose levels? >> he/she has to append more "-v"s to the shortcut. >> >> would "1" suffice, by default? > > IIRC the higher levels give you detailed parsing info and similar > extremely verbose information. I rarely see a reason to go there. > So I think '1' is a reasonable default for this. >
ok, sounds good. lubomir -- _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
