[2018-05-24 23:04:28 +0200] Berthold Stoeger: > On Donnerstag, 24. Mai 2018 22:46:30 CEST Gaetan Bisson wrote: > > [2018-05-23 07:20:43 -1000] Gaetan Bisson: > > > Oh, it's also there: > > > https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-67948 > > > > It turns out removing oldModel->deleteLater(); from DiveListView::reload() > > avoids the segfault. See the discussion in the above bug report. However I > > have no idea what the proper fix should be. > > For one, we could delete it directly, c.f. attached patch.
There's no segfault with that patch. Weird but good. :) -- Gaetan _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
