On Thu, Jun 14, 2018, 15:34 Long, Martin <mar...@longhome.co.uk> wrote:
> I'm in agreement with Davide that any interim solution we can get running > is better than the way it is working now. It's a regression, and tbh if > there isn't an interim solution then it ought to be reverted to the old > behaviour. At the moment I'm having to use Shearwater desktop for reviewing > all my logs. > I had to stop using Subsurface for the time being. First time in so many years. If the bug will be solved I would have to transfer and compile from scratch more than 60 dives (until now). I don't know if I will have the time or will to do all this work and frankly speaking I'm tired to be always a minority. Farewell my friends. It has been a nice journey. Thank you all for the amazing work. > davide@mobile >
_______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface