On 1/31/19 8:58 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
So Facebook just triggered a review of our Facebook integration (because the best way to deal with the fact that you are selling out the privacy of your users is to... never mind... I'm sure this makes sense). Our app failed every step of their review, likely because they have no bleeping idea what the app does as it doesn't match what people usually do with apps? not sure. But the results that they sent to me make no sense whatsoever. I will follow up with them because this whole thing bugs me, but fundamentally I don't think this is worth it and instead I'm considering to simply remove this feature from Subsurface 4.9. Comments, concerns?
I think it's not worth the pain. Its existence has always implied to me that perhaps subsurface would expand "share on" to include twitter and/or instagram (and/or I suppose snapshat?) That seems like a lot to chase.
Personally I've taken to syncing with divelogs.de. They've got tweet/google+/facebook sharing links - and interfacing with things like that seems more like their kind of thing. (or other websites like them - like if diviac or any of the other online logbooks grew reasonable upload/sync apis)
I vote kill it - for whatever my vote might be worth. _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
