> On Jul 30, 2019, at 3:15 PM, Dirk Hohndel <d...@hohndel.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 11:32:21PM +0200, Robert Helling wrote: >> Dirk, >> >> do you follow the discussion about how future versions of MacOS will very >> soon require programs to be notarised by Apple to be run: >> >> https://developer.apple.com/news/?id=04102019a >> >> Maybe you are already doing that, but I guess if not we will very soon have >> to look into this if we want to continue to distribute a Mac version. > > I'm not. It's on my increasingly unmaintainably long list of things to do...
I looked into this. It's at the same time not hard and annoyingly painful to do :-/ Can someone with the latest macOS try if this shows up as notarized? https://subsurface-divelog.org/downloads/test/Subsurface-4.9.0-35.dmg (note - this file is named Subsurface-4.9.0-35.dmg which is different from the https://subsurface-divelog.org/downloads/test/Subsurface-4.9.0-35-g29f5d15a6692.dmg I posted yesterday... this is intentional as I didn't want to break that test binary from yesterday by mistake... the one WITH the -g29f5d15a6692 should be NOT notarized. The one with the shorter name without the SHA should BE notarized) Thanks /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
