> On 11 May 2020, at 17:37, Dirk Hohndel <d...@hohndel.org> wrote: > > > >> On May 11, 2020, at 7:28 AM, Attilla de Groot via subsurface >> <subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Yesterday I updated to the latest Subsurface version on OS X and I notcied >> that the Information tab was updated. This has a small display bug as in the >> attached screenshot. >> >> I think that with “Current” Strong/Weak should be reversed or perhaps not >> indicated in stars. :-) > > There was some discussion about that when those new measurements were > introduced. > We settled on "the number of stars should reflect how good, how comfortable, > how fun a dive was". > So weak current, low surge, great visibility, etc. > > I find myself at times disagreeing with this (even though it was MY > suggestion), but every time I step back and ask myself "what's a dive with > all ratings 5 stars - which is what we are trained as consumers to think of > as 'perfect'?" > And high surge, high current, high chill don't fit that perception. So that's > why I think what we do is correct.
Ok, I didn't want to restart any discussion around this. It seems that you have given it sufficient thought and I can see that reasoning. — Attilla _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
