Yes, the US server VM ran out of memory and killed a process that didn't have 
an auto-restart in its systemd service file...

Should be up and running again.

Those who used the latest master SHOULD have been automatically redirected to 
the European server which continued working :-)

/D

> On Apr 24, 2021, at 11:54 AM, Attilla de Groot <atti...@attilla.nl> wrote:
> 
> Hi Dirk,
> 
> Are there any issues with the backend today? I’m not able to sync either from 
> my desktop or mobile (also over 4G).
> 
> 
> — Attilla
> 
>> On 19 Apr 2021, at 22:58, Dirk Hohndel via subsurface 
>> <subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Jason,
>> 
>> Thanks for the feedback. Yes, the new DNS records now have much longer TTL 
>> and are therefore more likely to be cached.
>> I also made some subtle changes to the logic when we first attempt to 
>> connect and actually try to start writing to the cloud that might make a 
>> difference there.
>> 
>> /D
>> 
>>> On Apr 19, 2021, at 1:50 PM, Jason Bramwell  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Many thanks as always.
>>> 
>>> I used to see a ‘feature’ where the first attempt to load Subsurface would 
>>> fall back to using the local cache and i’d have to close/reopen Subsurface 
>>> to get it to connect to the cloud storage, Linux diagnosed this as likely 
>>> slow DNS lookup, very brief testing (I do mean very brief) seems to 
>>> indicate that this is no longer the save now and it ‘just works’.
>>> 
>>> Jason
>>> 
>>> Sent from Mail for Windows 10
>>> 
>>> From: Dirk Hohndel via subsurface
>>> Sent: 19 April 2021 21:00
>>> To: Subsurface Mailing List
>>> Subject: redundant cloud servers
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Over the past couple of weeks I quietly moved the cloud server backend and 
>>> the authentication database out of my home network and back into the public 
>>> cloud.
>>> The fact that apparently no one noticed and nothing broke was rather 
>>> encouraging :-)
>>> 
>>> I then setup a second cloud server in the public cloud, this one in Europe 
>>> (actually, Frankfurt, Germany).
>>> 
>>> A few minutes ago I merged a pull request that adds a couple of interesting 
>>> new features to both Subsurface and Subsurface-mobile:
>>> 
>>> - geo based choice of cloud server (those in the Americas should end up 
>>> using the US server, everyone else should get directed to the European 
>>> server), which is intended to be completely transparent to the user.
>>> I.e., unless you explicitly look for it, you shouldn't notice (or care) 
>>> which server you are using
>>> - hot failover between the two servers (so if the server that you have used 
>>> before is unavailable, Subsurface and Subsurface-mobile should try the 
>>> other one - and the implementation makes it easy to add more servers if 
>>> that appears useful)
>>> 
>>> The two servers are automatically kept in sync in the background. I can 
>>> create one extremely artificial case where there is a fairly short 
>>> (generally sub one second in my tests) window for a race condition. A user 
>>> would have to have two different devices that are synced to different 
>>> servers (for example because they took their phone with them on an overseas 
>>> dive trip), that have made conflicting changes to the dive log, and the 
>>> user would then have to cause a save to the cloud on both devices within 
>>> the roughly one second window. Forcing that race turned out to be fairly 
>>> hard because the mobile app does a few other things before storing the data 
>>> to the cloud - so for testing I ended up using two instances of Subsurface 
>>> and synchronized clicks... really -- not a realistic scenario.
>>> 
>>> If this were to happen, I will get an automated email alert and fixing the 
>>> problem isn't really hard - but I wanted to give a full disclosure of the 
>>> issues that I am aware of.
>>> 
>>> What would help right now if people tested all this.
>>> So far I have not had the time to make new beta versions of 
>>> Subsurface-mobile, but as I said, it's actually easier to test on the 
>>> desktop.
>>> 
>>> /D
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> subsurface mailing list
>>> subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
>>> http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> subsurface mailing list
>> subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
>> http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
> 

_______________________________________________
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface

Reply via email to