On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 21:39, Benjamin M. Schwartz <[email protected]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > I don't know anything about GSoC, but to minimize confusion, it seems like > it might be helpful to inform Google that all OLPC GSoC participation will > occur via Sugar Labs (if indeed this is the case). That way the GSoC > people will not be surprised when all OLPC-related applications come > through Sugar Labs, and none come from OLPC.
We should take into account that organizations are assigned slots based on their well behaviour in past editions. Given that the OLPC and SugarLabs communities have had very different stories, I don't think it would be wise to mix both. Not to mention that GSoC people should be already used to forks and the like. Regards, Tomeu > - --Ben > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAklmZG0ACgkQUJT6e6HFtqQ0+ACdEACzTs1voHwnmYp6CDnss+qZ > Et4AniEcp+J22VtDrxOREQ6N8PlnHzh4 > =hHM2 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
