> The journal's search and browsing capabilities are less useful if all > entries are named the same regardless of their actual content or > meaning to the user.
What I cannot understand is why, after some two years of development, the only view of Journal entries that has been implemented is by "time sequence". If the user wants to pick something from among many entries of the same type (e.g., "audio"), he either has to look through them all, or has to remember an explicit "string" to search for. If the entries could optionally be 'sorted' (for instance, alphabetized), it would be easier to see "what is there and what is not". mikus _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel