On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Gary C Martin <g...@garycmartin.com> wrote:
> Happy to be proven wrong, and I guess it could be a Sugar feature not really
> intended for XOs.
Let's let the flowers bloom: I don't doubt that there are many ways to
make *better* collaboration, on an activity-by-activity basis. But
VNC is something that can be created as a common baseline. Let's
start by doing that, and improve it on a case-by-case basis, instead
of having *no collaboration* as our baseline.
FWIW, I second Carol's comments: VNC works quite nicely on fast local
networks, such as direction connections between XOs, and I've used it
on clients as simple as a Palm Pilot and a Mac SE/30. Reducing
graphic busy-ness and palette size helps a lot! Also: don't run
xvncviewer remotely: VNC is network efficient, but the way its X
client uses the network between it and the X server is definitely
*not*!
--scott
--
( http://cscott.net/ )
_______________________________________________
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
